tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9013927122787966062.post1803168522143242612..comments2022-12-21T01:53:55.276+00:00Comments on Mike's Microsoft Lync Blog: Lync Dial Plans and Normalization RulesUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9013927122787966062.post-4918866385728485472014-07-21T10:48:20.339+01:002014-07-21T10:48:20.339+01:00What about wrong formatted personal phonebook entr...What about wrong formatted personal phonebook entrys?<br />as example staff save often phonenumbers in this format:<br />+49(0)30123456789 (dialing failed because of "0")<br />better would be:<br />+49 (30)123456789 (dialing whit succeed)<br />correct would be:<br />+4930123456789 (dialing with success, but difficult to read contact's phone number<br /><br />thanksAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9013927122787966062.post-79800928107237395472014-07-21T10:43:02.425+01:002014-07-21T10:43:02.425+01:00Hi,
great explaining!
What about special character...Hi,<br />great explaining!<br />What about special characters like () ?<br />Wrong formatted personal contacts are often stored following:<br /> +49(0)301234 <br />should be normalized to<br /> +49301234 <br />Is () a to-do for normalization, that i need only to delete the "0"<br /><br />thanksAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9013927122787966062.post-84059930394998991072013-11-13T04:09:32.117+00:002013-11-13T04:09:32.117+00:00Thanks for this article, without something like th...Thanks for this article, without something like this it's hard to get a handle on what is actually relevant in the MSDN articles.<br />Question though:<br />If \d{4,} is the same as \d{3}\d+ - why does Lync default to the latter with the rule builder when the former is more space efficient? Is there a drawback to using this?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02416796687215573097noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9013927122787966062.post-2755409804603944682013-03-18T20:12:24.913+00:002013-03-18T20:12:24.913+00:00Looking for help: we have numbers +1 (xxx) xxx – x...Looking for help: we have numbers +1 (xxx) xxx – xxxx ext. 123<br /> How do I normalize this and get it to show up in lync, looking same way.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9013927122787966062.post-5075793934325245492013-03-18T16:57:57.979+00:002013-03-18T16:57:57.979+00:00Any idea on the uk 101 number?
I have my 999/112 n...Any idea on the uk 101 number?<br />I have my 999/112 numbers working fine but calls to 101 fail.<br /><br />Thanks<br />RobCount Zerohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14442400267911382493noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9013927122787966062.post-82214488967610633292012-09-19T20:33:24.621+01:002012-09-19T20:33:24.621+01:00I have the following scenario I am looking for hel...I have the following scenario I am looking for help on. We have lync connected into our Cs1k PBX. For now everyone has a number configured into the pbx and has the same number configured in lync but with a leading 0. We can call from lync to the IP soft clients but cannot call from the soft client to the lync 5 digit number (no dial plan found) is the result of the log. Everything else is working fine from lync, external pstn calls out, calls from the pstn into the conference bridge work fine, lync to lync work fine. Looking for what type of dial plan I need to configure.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9013927122787966062.post-60414616838218094562012-08-27T19:56:12.432+01:002012-08-27T19:56:12.432+01:00Hi Mike,
Short answer is you can't. If (like ...Hi Mike,<br /><br />Short answer is you can't. If (like me) you're stuck with DIDs that don't match you internal extensions in some fashion, you'll have to create a new normalization rule on your dial plan to match. i.e: (4 digit dialing)<br /><br />User 1<br />Normalization Rule: ^(xxxx)$<br />Translation Rule: +1xxxxxxxxxx;ext=$1<br /><br />Your only other option is to force everyone on your org to use their assigned when dialing internally or reassign all the extensions to match the DID. Probably not a great option as that will likely cause you even more headaches.<br /><br />Best of luck.<br /><br />Ivan Smith<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9013927122787966062.post-84366889658483133762012-08-09T23:38:39.926+01:002012-08-09T23:38:39.926+01:00Mike
You certainly are trying to make life hard f...Mike<br /><br />You certainly are trying to make life hard for yourself. I can't think of a way to do what you want. The normalization rules are essentially regex expressions but if there is no relationship between DID number and the corresponding extension then the regex won't work (or at least would have hundreds of 1-1 mappings).hhhhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14096673558114585297noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9013927122787966062.post-6919677446125406032012-08-07T20:23:36.206+01:002012-08-07T20:23:36.206+01:00I am trying to figure out how to configure Lync fo...I am trying to figure out how to configure Lync for DID and Extensions. The extensions are not the same as any of the DID. Example, DID 123-456-7890 Ext 1340. This way we can have DID for direct dial from outside and still use 4 digit dialing. I know the normalization for normal 4 digit dialing but we have 1000's of employees so some DIDs would overlap. Any help would be appreciated.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06747312262030446886noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9013927122787966062.post-14707006109890979042011-11-20T08:51:18.661+00:002011-11-20T08:51:18.661+00:00Excellent info. I wanted to point out that the exa...Excellent info. I wanted to point out that the example for "?" is incorrect. The example shown does not include a question mark.Pat Richardhttp://www.ehloworld.comnoreply@blogger.com